Methods: We searched PubMed for eligible articles and on-line databases for abstracts of major oncology meetings.

Results: Eight studies reported on the frequency of DDIs: six evaluated the frequency of potential DDIs, while two studies reported on real DDIs, i.e. interactions that had clinical consequences. Studies of potential DDIs found that approximately one-third of patients are exposed to dangerous drug doublets, with the most common ones involving warfarin and anticonvulsants. One study of real DDIs found that 2% of hospitalized cancer patients had a DDI as the cause of admission.

Conclusions: Drug interactions comprise an important issue in oncology, with approximately one-third of ambulatory cancer patients being at risk of DDIs. Data are limited on the clinical consequences of drug interactions among cancer patients.

Methods: From April to August 2007, a double-blind questionnaire with 13 common items graduated according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events was completed by clinicians and nurses for outpatients undergoing chemotherapy at our Medical Oncology Day Hospital Unit. Patients completed a modified questionnaire with simplified terms. They were requested to specify seriousness of symptoms with a subjective scale varying from 1 to 4. Every patient–nurse–clinician questionnaire was registered for the statistical analysis. Agreement was evaluated by Cohen's kappa coefficient.

Results: Eighty-five paired questionnaires were completed. Patients, nurses and clinicians agreed on most symptoms and toxicity grade. Agreements between patients and nurses were stronger than those between patients and physicians for the six most common symptoms: asthenia (kappa 75% versus 37%), constipation (83% versus 45%), neuropathy (82% versus 55%), mucositis (78% versus 46%) and diarrhoea (90% versus 77%). These differences mainly reflected differences in the proportion of positive agreement: nurses were more able to detect symptoms self-reported by patients than physicians. The only exception was nausea, as kappa coefficient was very good for both health professionals (91% versus 89%). When considering the different grade of toxicity by the weighted kappa coefficient, we scored again the highest agreement between patient and nurse, with weighted kappa ranging from 55% (asthenia) to 86% (diarrhoea), and the lowest agreement between patient and physician, with weighted kappa ranging from 32% (asthenia) to 74% (nausea). The agreement between physician and nurse slightly improved, with weighted kappa ranging from 41% (constipation) to 77% (nausea).

Conclusion: Our results support the validity of nurse toxicity reporting and that the nurse staff could be successfully employed in collecting toxicity data because of a greater ability to elicit information from patients than the medical staff.

Patients and methods: Consecutive cancer patients scheduled for chemotherapy randomly received: acenocumarine 1 mg/day for 3 days before and 8 days after central vein catheter (CVC) insertion; dalteparin 5000 IU 2 h before and daily for 8 days after CVC insertion; no anticoagulant treatment (NT). All patients underwent venography on days 8 and 30, some of them on days 90, 150 and 210 after CVC.

Results: A total of 450 patients were randomized, 348 underwent at least two venography. Both acenocumarine and dalteparin reduced venography-detected CVCrT rate [21.9% acenocumarine versus 52.6% NT, odds ratio (OR) 0.3, P < 0.01; 40% dalteparin versus 52.6% NT, OR 0.6, P = 0.05]. Acenocumarine was more effective than dalteparin (OR 0.4, P = 0.01). The rate of occlusive CVCrT was not different in the three groups (0.9% acenocumarine, 3.3% dalteparin, 1.8% NT; P = 0.40). Most CVCrTs (95.6%) were observed on day 8 after CVC insertion and were non-occlusive.

Conclusions: In this study of early and short-term prophylaxis, acenocumarine was more effective than dalteparin on non-occlusive and asymptomatic CVCrT events. The first days following CVC insertion represent the highest risk for CVCrT.

Materials and methods: After confirming the absence of safety issues in phase 1, a total of 33 cases were registered up to and including phase 2. Safety and efficacy were evaluated by National Cancer Institute—Common Toxicity Criteria version 2 and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1 week after PVP. Based on VAS score decreases, efficacy was classified into significantly effective (SE; ≥5 or reached 0–2), moderately effective (ME; 2–4), or ineffective (NE; <2 or increase).

Results: Procedures were completed in all 33 patients (42 vertebrae). Thirty days after PVP, two patients died of primary disease progression, but no major adverse reactions (>grade 2) were observed. Response rate was 70% (95% confidence interval 54% to 83%) [61% (n = 20) with SE, 9% (n = 3) with ME, and 30% (n = 10) with NE] and increased to 83% at week 4. Median time to response was 1 day (mean 2.4). Median pain-mitigated survival period was 73 days.

Conclusion: For PMVCF, PVP is a safe and effective treatment modality with immediate onset of action.

Patients and methods: Patients with EBC presenting to The Royal Marsden Hospital from June 2005 to September 2007 who had CNB and subsequent EB were included. ER and PgR were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and graded from 0 to 8 (Allred score). HER2 was determined by IHC and scored from 0 to 3+. FISH analysis was carried out in HER2 2+ cases and in discordant cases.

Results: In all, 336 pairs of samples were compared. ER was positive in 253 CNBs (75%) for 255 EBs (76%) and was discordant in six patients (1.8%). PgR was positive in 221 CNBs (66%) and 227 (67.6%) EBs being discordant in 52 cases (15%). HER2 was positive in 41 (12.4%) of the 331 CNBs in which it was determined compared with 44 (13.3%) EBs and discordant in four cases (1.2%).

Conclusions: CNB can be used with confidence for ER and HER2 determination. For PgR, due to a substantial discordance between CNB and EB, results from CNB should be used with caution.

Methods: A total of 789 patients with recurrent breast cancer were studied. ER, PR, and HER2 status were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or FISH. Repeat markers for ER, PR, and HER2 were available in 28.9%, 27.6%, and 70.0%, respectively. Primary and recurrent tumors were classified as triple receptor-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or receptor-positive breast cancer (RPBC, i.e. expressing at least one receptor). Discordance was correlated with clinical/pathological parameters.

Results: Discordance for ER, PR, and HER2 was 18.4%, 40.3%, and 13.6%, respectively. Patients with concordant RPBC had significantly better post-recurrence survival (PRS) than discordant cases; patients with discordant receptor status had similarly unfavorable survival as patients with concordant TNBC. IHC scores for ER and PR showed weak concordance between primary and recurrent tumors. Concordance of HER2–FISH scores was higher.

Conclusions: Concordance of quantitative hormone receptor measurements between primary and recurrent tumors is modest consistent with suboptimal reproducibility of measurement methods, particularly for IHC. Discordant cases have poor survival probably due to inappropriate use of targeted therapies. However, biological change in clinical phenotype cannot be completely excluded.

Patients and methods: MBC patients were enrolled to receive six cycles of PLD 35 mg/m² (day 1) and docetaxel 40 mg/m² (days 1 and 15), every 28 days (group A). Because of unacceptable toxic effects, doses were modified to PLD 30 mg/m² (day 1) and docetaxel 75 mg/m² (day 2), every 3 weeks (group B). The primary end point was clinical benefit.

Results: Sixty-seven patients were included (group A, 53; group B, 14). In both groups, the median number of cycles delivered was 4 and the overall dose intensity was 82% for docetaxel and 71% for PLD. In group A, main toxic effects were hematologic, palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), and stomatitis. In group B, higher rates of grade 3–4 PPE, febrile neutropenia, and hematologic toxic effects were reported. The rate of clinical benefit was 47%. Among patients with a measurable disease, 49% achieved a partial response, 27% had a stable disease, and 13% progressed, according to RECIST criteria.

Conclusion: The combination of PLD and docetaxel delivered at planned doses in this study yields unacceptable toxicity and should not be used routinely in patients with MBC.

Patients and methods: LMCRC patients were randomized to receive every 14 days, FA, 400 mg/m² infused over 2 h, followed by 5-FU as a 400 mg/m² i.v. bolus, followed by continuous 5-FU infusion, 2400 mg/m² over 46 h (LV5FUs) with or without irinotecan: 180 mg/m² infusion (FOLFIRI). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety.

Results: Treated patients (n = 306) were balanced for critical prognostic factors in each arm. Median DFS in patients receiving LV5FUs was 21.6 versus 24.7 months for FOLFIRI [hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, log-rank P = 0.44]. No significant differences were found in OS. A trend was observed for improved DFS in patients receiving FOLFIRI within 42 days of surgery (HR 0.75, P = 0.17). Grade 3/4 toxic effects were more common in patients treated with FOLFIRI versus LV5FUs (47% versus 30%) with neutropenia being most common (23% versus 7%).

Conclusion: FOLFIRI in the adjuvant treatment of LMCRC showed no significant improvement in DFS compared with LV5FUs.

Materials and methods: CRPC patients with progression after docetaxel (Taxotere) therapy received pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) i.v. every 3 weeks. The primary end point was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. A pharmacogenetic analysis of the reduced folate carrier-1 gene (RFC1) G80A polymorphism was also carried out.

Results: Forty-nine patients were enrolled: median age 68 years, median baseline PSA 72 ng/ml, and median Karnofsky performance status of 90. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred in 20 (43%) and four patients (8%), respectively. Confirmed >50% PSA decline occurred in four patients (8%), stable PSA lasting at least 12 weeks in 10 patients (20%). A significant relationship was observed between time from prior docetaxel therapy and overall survival. Pharmacogenetic analyses of RFC1 G80A genotype frequencies showed no relationship between genotypes and clinical efficacy.

Conclusions: Pemetrexed treatment of CRPC patients after docetaxel therapy was associated with only modest clinical activity. Further investigation of pemetrexed as a single agent in a nonenriched CRPC population is unlikely to add significant clinical benefit over that seen with traditional second-line chemotherapy agents such as mitoxantrone.

Design and methods: We treated patients <61 years with high-risk aggressive lymphoma with four to six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (MegaCHOEP) necessitating repeated ASCT. Outcomes of patients with mature T-NHL (excluding anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma) and aggressive B-NHL were compared using multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Results: Compared with 84.4% of B-NHL patients, 66.7% of T-NHL patients were able to receive all treatments; the rates of progressive disease were 27.3% in T-NHL and 16.3% in B-NHL patients. At 3 years, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival were significantly worse for T-NHL [25.9% confidence interval (CI) 10.4% to 41.4% and 44.5% CI 26.5% to 62.5%) than for B-NHL patients (60.1% CI 52.1% to 68.1%; P < 0.001 and 63.4% CI 55.4% to 71.4%; P = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, T-NHL was a strongly significant adverse risk factor for EFS (relative risk 2.2, P = 0.001).

Conclusions: MegaCHOEP for T-NHL patients was no better than other high-dose regimens and was unable to address the major problems of HDT/ASCT: neither early progressions nor early relapses were reduced. This study sheds some doubt on expectations that HDT/ASCT will significantly improve outcomes for patients with T-NHL.

Materials and methods: Four hundred and seventy-six patients <60 years old with newly diagnosed CD20+ DLBCL were randomised to induction with ACE or ACVBP. Three hundred and thirty responders received HDT followed by ASCT. After ASCT, 269 patients were re-randomised to receive either maintenance rituximab or observation alone. Randomisation was stratified by the quality of response to ASCT. The primary end point of this study was event-free survival (EFS).

Results: At a median of 4 years’ follow-up from the second randomisation, there was a trend (P = 0.1) towards increased EFS for patients who received rituximab compared with observation.

Conclusion: The type of induction therapy (ACVBP or ACE) did not significantly affect overall survival at a median 51 months’ follow-up.

Patients and methods: Patients with histologically proven, previously untreated follicular or marginal-zone PBL (MZL PBL) diagnosed from 1980 to 2003 were included in the study. Major end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and potential prognostic factors.

Results: We collected data on 60 cases of PBL [36 follicular and 24 marginal-zone lymphoma (MZL)]. Stage was I_E or II_E in 57 patients and IVE in three patients due to bilateral breast involvement. Surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT), alone or in combination, were used as first-line treatments in 67%, 42% and 52% of patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 98%, with a 93% complete response rate. Five-year PFS were 56% for MZL and 49% for follicular PBL (P = 0.62). Relapses were mostly in distant sites (18 of 23 cases); no patients relapsed within RT fields.

Conclusions: Our data showed an indolent behaviour of MZL PBL, comparable to other primary extranodal MZL. Conversely, patients with follicular PBL had inferior PFS and OS when compared with limited-stage nodal follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, suggesting an adverse prognostic role of primary breast localisation in this histological subgroup.

Patients and methods: Patients referred to our institution during a 5-year period for treatment of acute leukemia/myelodysplasia and who had received adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer are included. Leukemia-free survival for the whole group and for patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was estimated.

Results: Fifteen women (14 with acute leukemia and one with myelodysplasia) were identified. Seven of 15 patients had received an anthracycline, cyclophosphamide and a taxane. Ten patients developed acute leukemia/myelodysplasia with a latency period of 2 years or less from initiation of chemotherapy. Although mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) rearrangement was the commonest chromosomal abnormality (8 of 15 patients), various other chromosomal abnormalities were also detected. Twelve of 15 patients underwent HSCT (11 allogeneic and one autologous). Eleven of these 12 patients who underwent HSCT were in remission at a median follow-up of 20.4 months (range 4.4–53.3 months).

Conclusion: Durable remissions can be achieved in patients who develop acute leukemia/myelodysplasia secondary to adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer and are able to undergo allogeneic HSCT. Our results indicate that HSCT should be an early consideration in the management of such patients who are suitable candidates for the procedure.

Patients and methods: Cases comprised 37 patients who underwent RIC allo-HCT. Haemopoietic cell grafts were harvested from HLA-matched siblings (27) and unrelated donors (7). Controls consisted of 43 patients from the same institutions who received conventional therapy only. Matching variables were age at diagnosis and time to first CLL-specific therapy.

Results: Both patient groups were well balanced in terms of cytogenetics by FISH, CD38 and ZAP-70 expression, and immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region mutational status. Median overall survival was 113 months for HCT patients and 85 months for controls when calculated from time of diagnosis (P = 0.072) and 103 and 67 months, respectively, when calculated from time of first therapy (P = 0.041).

Conclusion: RIC allo-HCT is a reasonable option for patients with high-risk CLL. However, these results require confirmation before the procedure can be recommended outside clinical trials.

Patients and methods: Forty-eight of 127 (37.8%) lymphoma patients were HBsAg negative and HBcAb positive, and 24 of these patients were then given liver function tests and HBsAg tests monthly and serum HBV DNA every 3 months.

Results: HBV reactivation was observed in two patients (4.1%) who had received intensive chemotherapy including steroid and rituximab. Immediate administration of entecavir therapy after elevation of HBV DNA level was conducted, and this resulted in reduction of it and improvement of liver function test.

Conclusions: Rituximab plus steroid-containing regimens may increase the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative and HBcAb-positive lymphoma patients. More ambitious prospective studies are required to establish clinically useful or cost-effective follow-up methods for control of HBV reactivation in lymphoma patients with occult HBV infection.